On 07/07/2011 10:42 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hey,
We have an inconsistency where the Deltacloud 'rhevm' and 'vsphere'
driver names differ from the 'rhev-m' and 'vmware' names we use for
Image Factory targets and Conductor provider types.
Maybe dumb question, shouldn't it be "vcenter" instead of
"vsphere"?
Regards,
Tomas
I think we should avoid propagating this inconsistency and
standardise
on the deltacloud names. There really isn't any reason to use different
names, especially at this early stage where backwards compatibility
isn't a big issue.
What do you guys think? Just make the switch now? Patches to follow
Also, for reference:
https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/aeolus-devel/2011-June/002120.html
https://www.aeolusproject.org/redmine/issues/1200
https://www.aeolusproject.org/redmine/issues/1525
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/715087
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/715601
Cheers,
Mark.
_______________________________________________
aeolus-devel mailing list
aeolus-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/aeolus-devel