On 09/15/2011 11:30 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
...
> Here's what I managed to get from looking at Katello's usage of OAuth
> for similar purposes.
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the survey and references.
> * Despite all the dire warnings of OAuth 1.0 being a terrible protocol,
> that does appear to be what we're using:
>
>
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5849
Can anyone give us an ETA for a Katello update to OAuth 2.0?
We seem to be ok with what we have in place now. What would drive the
change to 2.0?
-- bk