On 11/04/2011, at 10:38 PM, Chris Lalancette wrote:
On 04/11/11 - 12:30:21AM, Justin Clift wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thinking about numbering systems we can use, and trying
> to figure out the best approach for Aeolus.
>
> For example, should we start with 0.1.0, or 0.5.0, 1.0.0,
> or something else? (ie Aeolus 0.1.0)
>
> Also what do we call this initial version we're putting
> together for this sprint? It won't be production
> quality, but we're aiming for people to be able to try
> it out.
>
> I'm thinking maybe "Alpha 1"?
>
> i.e. Aeolus 0.1.0 Alpha 1 or similar
>
> Good/bad idea, etc?
Good question. I don't care all that much, but my personal preference is to
start with 0.1.0, and iterate from there. The important point is that we make
it clear in the source and the documentation which version is released and
what the next version to be released is.
Yep. It also gives us a more user-friendly way to communicate which release(s)
we're expecting features and similar to arrive in.
We can probably go with 0.1.0 for the present series, and Alpha 1 for this
sprint's release, unless comes up with something better. :)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift