On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 02:13:30PM +0200, Tomas Von Veschler wrote:
On 07/07/2011 10:42 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hey,
>
> We have an inconsistency where the Deltacloud 'rhevm' and 'vsphere'
> driver names differ from the 'rhev-m' and 'vmware' names we use for
> Image Factory targets and Conductor provider types.
Maybe dumb question, shouldn't it be "vcenter" instead of
"vsphere"?
Regards,
Tomas
We ran afoul of this debate before. I guess I'd prefer "vcenter" since
"vsphere" can apparently mean a whole raft of stuff on the vmware
world, but I really ultimately don't care even a little bit.
--H
> I think we should avoid propagating this inconsistency and
standardise
> on the deltacloud names. There really isn't any reason to use different
> names, especially at this early stage where backwards compatibility
> isn't a big issue.
>
> What do you guys think? Just make the switch now? Patches to follow
>
> Also, for reference:
>
>
https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/aeolus-devel/2011-June/002120.html
>
https://www.aeolusproject.org/redmine/issues/1200
>
https://www.aeolusproject.org/redmine/issues/1525
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/715087
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/715601
>
> Cheers,
> Mark.
>
> _______________________________________________
> aeolus-devel mailing list
> aeolus-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/aeolus-devel
_______________________________________________
aeolus-devel mailing list
aeolus-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/aeolus-devel
--
== Hugh Brock, hbrock(a)redhat.com ==
== Engineering Manager, Cloud BU ==
== Aeolus Project: Manage virtual infrastructure across clouds. ==
==
http://aeolusproject.org ==
"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I’m
not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."
--Robert McCloskey