On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 00:30 +1000, Justin Clift wrote:
For example, should we start with 0.1.0, or 0.5.0, 1.0.0,
or something else? (ie Aeolus 0.1.0)
If you call it 0.1.0 Alpha, I'd expect there to be a 0.1.0 Beta, 0.1.0
RC and 0.1.0 GA together with a dedicated cycle to get from one state to
the other.
If, as is common for open source projects, release qualification is
simply best effort, rather than through a well-defined process, I
wouldn't bother with alpha, beta etc. and just go straight to RC or even
GA.
If 0.1.0 falls over, there's always room for an 0.1.1 ;)
David