On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 18:16 -0400, Joseph VLcek wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 13:20 -0400, Mike Orazi wrote:
> On 09/23/2011 04:30 PM, Hugh Brock wrote:
> > Cloud-init is going into Fedora. I know it's only useful for EC2 at
> > the moment, but should we be looking at leveraging it?
> >
> > --Hugh
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aeolus-devel mailing list
> > aeolus-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> >
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/aeolus-devel
>
>
> This seems close to what we must have to do in bootstrapping audrey.
> I'd imagine it would be worth taking a look at to see how much overlap
> there is with out currently solution and how much difficulty there would
> be in making it able to cope with the virtual-cd method we are using on
> other providers.
>
> M
> _______________________________________________
> aeolus-devel mailing list
> aeolus-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/aeolus-devel
I took a quick look and it seems what they are doing is similar to what
we are now doing in regard to allowing the user to specify tooling, a
script, to run at launch time. They seem to allow for more flexibility
in the format of the tooling.
The thing that we are doing w/Audrey, which it doesn't seem they are
doing, is allowing for the passing of parameter- name/values between
launching instances.
Mike ping me if you get some cycles to chat. Perhaps we could pull in
Greg and Dan too.
Joe
In thinking this over last night, it doesn't appear to me that
Cloud-init provides enough functionality for us to change course from
the current, Config Server/Audrey Agent path.
Config Server/Audrey Agent path provides better sharing of parameters
across multiple instances and is "not" limited to EC2.
Joe