On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:56:36PM +0100, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
I didn't see this mentioned in any of the cabal-related e-mails,
apologies if it was.
These meetings are supposed to have influence over the direction of
Aeolus. As such, they should be public to provide transparency and
hold the members accountable.
Note that I'm content with a "read-only" format. If the goal is to
settle disputes and move things forward, having too many inputs
would be detrimental.
If the meetings are over IRC, this is easy. If we were to hold
calls, I would suggest google hangouts or something similar.
Thomas
PS: I do realise this is contrary to the meaning of the word
"cabal". Let's keep it anyway. It sounds better than "committee".
Yes, a public Cabal is a bit of a contradiction, but, well, as Emerson
says, "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds."
Totally agree the meetings do need to be public. I think each cabal
should decide what the ideal format is for their purpose. I'd suggest a
google hangout for the initial meeting(s), with a youtube stream, but
later meetings could just as well be IRC depending on the topic.
--Hugh
--
== Hugh Brock, hbrock(a)redhat.com ==
== Engineering Manager, Cloud BU ==
== Aeolus Project: Manage virtual infrastructure across clouds. ==
==
http://aeolusproject.org ==
"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I’m
not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."
--Robert McCloskey