On 05/26/2011 04:25 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> - Services are at the deployable level, not the template level
Result of the discussion was services are at the assembly level.
(Deployable is just the group of machines, and targeting info.)
The statement of not the template level in most part agree with expect
for the following. If a template is paramaterized in any way that should
be done with a service definition (at the assembly level is fine), so
that namespacing conflicts, can be avoided and that we don't loose the
visualization of the meta data.
One thing I missed, is that if the service is ManagedJBoss Content, the
when I build
the image, I need to consider the services in the assembly and make sure
required
packages for the agent are in the image.
This is why jrd will make the point that some services are at the
template level as they
require bits, some are just script and which point we can inject them.
So, we either need to say some services are at the template level, or ??