On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 19:20 -0400, solarflow99 wrote:
Since i've been using it, its been flawless. Its a scalable
implementation, 389-console was great for providing a refined way to
setup replication, SSL certs, etc. You might want to use a better
front end to administer users, groups, etc. I'd recommend it for
production. If you need commercial support, there's Redhat directory
Server. hope this helps..
<snip>
Any input on 389 versus RedHat DS for production? We need to upgrade our
DS soon and are wondering if 389 would be the better way to go but we
are hesitant as we always think of Fedora projects as experimental and
RedHat as stable. In this case, the rapid advancement might be a
distinct advantage. Thanks - John