Noriko,
*I have one question. In your first email, you wrote this, in which the
problem is in 2012R2, but not in 2008R2.*
*Sorry, I don't have any 2008 r2 in my lab... I just tested with 2012 r2
and it failed. *
*Here's my scenarios*
*My lab environment:*
*389-ds-base 1.3.4.8 + win 2012 r2*
*OU just in 389 side with users: Full sync failed, log error:*
*[17/May/2016:14:19:44 -0300] - Attempting to add entry cn=mais um
teste,ou=teste,ou=RNP,dc=homolog,dc=rnp to AD for local entry
uid=teste.teste,ou=teste,ou=RNP,dc=homolog,dc=rnp[17/May/2016:14:19:44
-0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01"
(gti-df-dc01:636): Received result code 32 (0000208D: NameErr:
DSID-03100238, problem 2001 (NO_OBJECT), data 0, best match of:
'OU=RNP,DC=homolog,DC=rnp' ) for add operation[17/May/2016:14:19:44 -0300]
NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01"
(gti-df-dc01:636): windows_process_total_add: Cannot replay add
operation.[17/May/2016:14:19:44 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync
- agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): Beginning linger on the
connection[17/May/2016:14:19:44 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync
- agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): windows_tot_run: failed to
obtain data to send to the consumer; LDAP error - 1[17/May/2016:14:19:44
-0300] - Calling dirsync search request plugin[17/May/2016:14:19:44 -0300]
- Sending dirsync search request[17/May/2016:14:19:45 -0300]
NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01"
(gti-df-dc01:636): Cancelling linger on the connection[17/May/2016:14:19:45
-0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01"
(gti-df-dc01:636): Disconnected from the consumer[17/May/2016:14:19:45
-0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync - windows_inc_runs: cancelled
dirsync: 7fa660001d60, rval: 1*
*OU just in AD side with users: Full sync ok*
*My production environment:*
*389-ds-base 1.3.2.19 + win 2008 r2 *
*OU just in 389 side with users: Full sync ok*
*OU just in AD side with users: Full sync ok*
*If you need any other info, please let me know.*
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Noriko Hosoi <nhosoi(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Thank you for your input, Alberto.
On 05/17/2016 07:38 AM, Alberto Viana wrote:
Rich,
I'm aware of that, what I'm trying to say is: Is the expected behavior to
sync do not complete or stop because of one or more OUs does not exists in
one of the sides (389 or AD)? Is not suppose to just generate some error
and must go on?
I think so, too.
I have one question. In your first email, you wrote this, in which the
problem is in 2012R2, but not in 2008R2.
> I'm trying to setup a new scenario with 389 and AD 2012 R2 (So far I'm
using with AD 2008 R2 and everything works fine).
Did you have a chance to run "full sync" against 2008R2, as well? Or just
against 2012R2 and it failed?
There should not be a difference there, IMO...
Thanks,
--noriko
Thanx
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> On 05/17/2016 08:01 AM, Alberto Viana wrote:
>
> Noriko,
>
> Just to let you know, after I replicated/created the exactly same OU
> structure on both side, the replication seems to works fine. I'm still not
> sure that is the expected behavior:
>
>
> Yes, it is. Winsync does _not_ sync the OU structure - you have to set
> that up manually so that the OU structure in AD matches the OU structure in
> 389.
>
>
>
> [17/May/2016:10:56:53 -0300] - windows_conn_connect : detected Win2k3 or
> later peer
> [17/May/2016:10:56:53 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync -
> agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): No linger to cancel on the
> connection
> [17/May/2016:10:56:54 -0300] - _csngen_adjust_local_time: gen state
> before 573b22010001:1463493115:0:6
> [17/May/2016:10:56:54 -0300] - _csngen_adjust_local_time: gen state after
> 573b232c0000:1463493414:0:6
> [17/May/2016:10:56:54 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync -
> windows_acquire_replica returned success (101)
> [17/May/2016:10:56:54 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync -
> agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): State:
> ready_to_acquire_replica -> sending_updates
> [17/May/2016:10:56:54 -0300] - csngen_adjust_time: gen state before
> 573b232c0001:1463493414:0:6
> [17/May/2016:10:56:54 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - changelog program -
> _cl5GetDBFile: found DB object 1b9d570 for database
>
/opt/dirsrv/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-RNP/changelogdb/169ce382-1b9011e6-91ddc5b4-dc63c95a_55c88d99000000c80000.db
>
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Alberto Viana < <albertocrj(a)gmail.com>
> albertocrj(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Noriko,
>>
>> *Did you use the same version of 389-ds-base against AD on 2008 R2 and
>> 2012 R2?*
>> *389-Directory/1.3.4.8 <
http://1.3.4.8> B2016.063.1654*
>> *Please share the output frpm this command line "rpm -q 389-ds-base"?*
>>
>> *I compiled 389 manually once the package in apt repo is too old for me
>> (I'm using ubuntu 14.04 LTS). What specific info do you need?*
>> *ds-base is 1.3.4.8*
>>
>> *Does this error message follow some other detailed error messages?
>> Such as ...*
>> *YOUR_AGREEMENT_NAMEFailed to send %s operation: LDAP error (ERROR_CODE)
>> ERROR_MESSAGE*
>> *or *
>> *YOUR_AGREEMENT: Received error [%s] when attempting to %s entry [%s]:
>> Please correct the attribute specified in the error message. Refer to the
>> Windows Active Directory docs for more information.*
>> *If not, could you enable the replication log level and share the error
>> log with us?*
>>
>> *After enable replication log level:*
>> *[17/May/2016:09:13:18 -0300] - Attempting to add entry cn=Benedito
>> Maia,ou=pop-go,ou=POPS,ou=EXTERNOS,ou=RNP,dc=homolog,dc=rnp to AD for local
>> entry
>> uid=benedito.maia,ou=pop-go,ou=POPS,ou=EXTERNOS,ou=RNP,dc=homolog,dc=rnp*
>> *[17/May/2016:09:13:18 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync -
>> agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): Received result code 32
>> (0000208D: NameErr: DSID-03100238, problem 2001 (NO_OBJECT), data 0, best
>> match of: 'OU=POPS,OU=EXTERNOS,OU=RNP,DC=homolog,DC=rnp' ) for add
>> operation *
>> *[17/May/2016:09:13:18 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync -
>> agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636):
windows_process_total_add:
>> Cannot replay add operation.*
>> *[17/May/2016:09:13:18 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync -
>> agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): Beginning linger on the
>> connection*
>> *[17/May/2016:09:13:18 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync -
>> agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): windows_tot_run: failed
to
>> obtain data to send to the consumer; LDAP error - 1*
>>
>> *Once I do not have the same OU structure on both side (for testing
>> purposes), I created
"**ou=pop-go,ou=POPS,ou=EXTERNOS,ou=RNP,dc=homolog,dc=rnp"
>> on AD side and started to get error in another OU that I have on 389 side
>> but not in AD.*
>>
>> *Is that the expected behavior?*
>>
>> *PS: In my production environment we use this strategy that what we dont
>> want to be replicated, just not create the OU structure and works fine. I
>> never found a better way to do that like a "exclude list".*
>>
>>
>> *Could you also share your Windows Sync agreement? Do you happen to
>> have 2 Directory Servers -- one for 2008R2 and another for 2012R2, could
>> you provide both?*
>>
>>
>> *Here's my sync agreement:*
>>
>> *dn: cn=AD -
>> DF-GTI-DC01,cn=replica,cn=dc\3Dhomolog\2Cdc\3Drnp,cn=mapping tree,*
>> * cn=config*
>> *objectClass: top*
>> *objectClass: nsDSWindowsReplicationAgreement*
>> *description: Sync with HOMOLOG DF-GTI-DC01*
>> *cn: AD - DF-GTI-DC01*
>> *nsds7WindowsReplicaSubtree: dc=homolog,dc=rnp*
>> *nsds7DirectoryReplicaSubtree: dc=homolog,dc=rnp*
>> *nsds7NewWinUserSyncEnabled: on*
>> *nsds7NewWinGroupSyncEnabled: on*
>> *nsds7WindowsDomain: homolog.rnp*
>> *nsDS5ReplicaRoot: dc=homolog,dc=rnp*
>> *nsDS5ReplicaHost: gti-df-dc01.homolog.rnp*
>> *nsDS5ReplicaPort: 636*
>> *nsDS5ReplicaBindDN: CN=Conta de sincronizacao do AD com LDAP
>> 389,OU=APLICACOES*
>> * ,DC=homolog,DC=rnp*
>> *nsDS5ReplicaTransportInfo: SSL*
>> *nsDS5ReplicaBindMethod: SIMPLE*
>> *nsDS5ReplicaCredentials:
>> {AES-TUhNR0NTcUdTSWIzRFFFRkRUQm1NRVVHQ1NxR1NJYjNEUUVG*
>>
>> * RERBNEJDUXhNVEZoWmpjMVlTMDVaakkyTXpBNA0KTnkwNVl6RmxOV1UwWXkxaVpHWTBaVEkwWkFBQ*
>>
>> * 0FRSUNBU0F3Q2dZSUtvWklodmNOQWdjd0hRWUpZSVpJQVdVRA0KQkFFcUJCQ0FNQytucnM5R09Pbm*
>> * IrTGc5Q1BURw==}y3eiY+wIKrDUOvz08JXugA==*
>> *nsds7DirsyncCookie::
>> TVNEUwMAAABTrjoAO7DRAQAAAAAAAAAAWAAAAMJLBQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*
>>
>> * ADCSwUAAAAAAOaoLC8LQH5DrKGkZbG6hSgBAAAAAAAAAAMAAAAAAAAAUFu8Kzif9UKPjH3e1siBWw*
>>
>> * A5AQAAAAAA5qgsLwtAfkOsoaRlsbqFKMNLBQAAAAAAdqnRrgBktU6JZXBssjxeIesdBQAAAAAA*
>> *nsds5replicareapactive: 0*
>> *nsds5replicaLastUpdateStart: 20160517125737Z*
>> *nsds5replicaLastUpdateEnd: 20160517125737Z*
>> *nsds5replicaChangesSentSinceStartup:*
>> *nsds5replicaLastUpdateStatus: 0 Replica acquired successfully:
>> Incremental upd*
>> * ate started*
>> *nsds5replicaUpdateInProgress: FALSE*
>> *nsds5replicaLastInitStart: 20160517124301Z*
>> *nsds5replicaLastInitEnd: 20160517125236Z*
>> *nsds5replicaLastInitStatus: 1 connection error: operation failure -
>> Total upda*
>> * te aborted*
>>
>>
>> *In this testing environment, I just have 2012 r2 (I upgraded all DCs to
>> 2012). Right now, I don't have any 2008 r2 to test. *
>>
>> *In my production environment I have:*
>> *389-ds-base 1.3.2.19 + Windows 2008 r2*
>>
>> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Noriko Hosoi < <nhosoi(a)redhat.com>
>> nhosoi(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/16/2016 01:01 PM, Alberto Viana wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm trying to setup a new scenario with 389 and AD 2012 R2 (So far
I'm
>>> using with AD 2008 R2 and everything works fine).
>>>
>>> Did you use the same version of 389-ds-base against AD on 2008 R2 and
>>> 2012 R2?
>>>
>>> 389-Directory/1.3.4.8 B2016.063.1654
>>>
>>> Please share the output frpm this command line "rpm -q
389-ds-base"?
>>>
>>>
>>> Windows 2012 R2 64bits
>>>
>>> Both 2008 R2 and 2012 R2 are supported.
>>>
>>> :
>>> After configure the AD replication and Initiate a full sync, it starts
>>> to do some entries and I got the following error:
>>>
>>>
>>> [16/May/2016:16:36:47 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync -
>>> agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636):
windows_process_total_add:
>>> Cannot replay add operation.
>>>
>>> Does this error message follow some other detailed error messages?
>>> Such as ...
>>>
>>> YOUR_AGREEMENT_NAMEFailed to send %s operation: LDAP error (ERROR_CODE)
>>> ERROR_MESSAGE
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> YOUR_AGREEMENT: Received error [%s] when attempting to %s entry [%s]:
>>> Please correct the attribute specified in the error message. Refer to the
>>> Windows Active Directory docs for more information.
>>>
>>> If not, could you enable the replication log level and share the error
>>> log with us?
>>>
>>>
>>> And after that:
>>>
>>> [16/May/2016:16:36:47 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync -
>>> agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): Replica has no update
vector.
>>> It has never been initialized.
>>> [16/May/2016:16:36:47 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync -
>>> agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): Replica has no update
vector.
>>> It has never been initialized.
>>> [16/May/2016:16:36:51 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync -
>>> agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): Replica has no update
vector.
>>> It has never been initialized.
>>>
>>>
>>> I found a really old ticket that seems to be related to same error:
>>>
>>> <
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47589>
>>>
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47589
>>>
>>> This is a regression only affected 389-ds-base-1.3.1.x. So, 1.3.4.x
>>> does not need the patch.
>>>
>>>
>>> but with win2008r2 and fixed.
>>>
>>> According to this link ->
>>>
<
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/10...
>>>
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/10...
>>>
>>> 2012 R2 is supported, is that true?
>>>
>>> Could you also share your Windows Sync agreement? Do you happen to
>>> have 2 Directory Servers -- one for 2008R2 and another for 2012R2, could
>>> you provide both?
>>>
>>>
>>> Any clues?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> 389-users mailing
list389-users@lists.fedoraproject.orghttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> 389-users mailing list
>>> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>
>>>
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> 389-users mailing
list389-users@lists.fedoraproject.orghttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
>
> --
> 389-users mailing list
> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
--
389-users mailing
list389-users@lists.fedoraproject.orghttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
389-users mailing list
389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org