-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf
Of Mike Jackson
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 1:03 PM
To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Virtual DIT views vs
hierarchical DIT
Pete Rowley wrote:
>
> Usually you give a third party application a base dn, that
base dn can
> be a view. Views were designed such that the client need
not know it
> is using a view based dit so compatibility isn't much of an
issue for most clients.
>
And when the application needs to create it's own arbitrarily
named sub branches? I'm talking about applications like
Tivoli User Manager, etc.
You mean a sub-branch in the view? That should work without issue. Do you
have an example where compatibility like this is definitely broken?