On 11/04/2013 07:52 PM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote:
No matter that they are different versions?
Yes. IMO, it would be very bad programming practice to change the
replication protocol to be incompatible in every major version. It
would make upgrades and interoperability a nightmare.
On Nov 4, 2013 12:21 PM, "Rich Megginson"
<rmeggins(a)redhat.com
<mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 11/04/2013 08:16 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote:
>
> Hi Rich, Can you be more specific?
>
> On Nov 4, 2013 11:49 AM, "Rich Megginson" <rmeggins(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> On 11/03/2013 05:15 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote:
>
> Hi people ...
>
> Nowadays, I have CentOS5 on my servers, but next year I
> ll start
> setting up CentOS 6 on them.
>
> I ll first install 389DS on the main CentOS5 servers from
> EPEL
> repository (currently version 1.2.1) and I guess
> replication between
> them ll work fine because I m using the same version of
> 389DS.
>
> The thing is that EPEL for CentOS 6 has 389DS version
> 1.2.2 instead of 1.2.1.
>
> So, what would a safe way to migrate to a newer version
> of 389DS?
>
> - Do I have to migrate all CentOS 5 servers participating
> in the
> replication process at the same time to CentOS 6?
>
> No.
>
All versions of 389/RHDS/CentOS DS can replicate with each other.
> - How do you handle that kind of situations? Is there any
> documentation I can read?
>
> Thanks!
>
>