Ben Cohen wrote:
Is the userRoot database treated specially in any way by fedora
directory server?
I setup a directory server and made it a supplier of its userRoot
database. I installed a second server and set its default suffix to
the same as the first server's when I created the directory instance
(so the db named 'userRoot' created on the second server had the same
root suffix as the db on the first server). I then replicated the
first server's userRoot database to the second server (first server is
supplier, second is consumer).
My intention is that the second server will carry a read-only replica
of the first server's database but the worry was raised that the
userRoot database might be treated specially by some portion of the
directory server and not like being a read only replica ...?
No, there is nothing
special about the userRoot database. That's just
the name given to the suffix used for user&group data that was
configured during set up. The suffix name is what matters, not the
database name.
Should this be a concern? Any clarity is appreciated.
Thanks much.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users