On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> I'm not sure what you mean by "what's available
in the repo" vs. "what's available by source”.
> ya know, i am not really sure either. but you’re response reinforces in my mind that
something weird is going on here and i have to have a chat with my sysadmins as to why i
am not seeing what i should be seeing in the EPEL repos - we have firewall stuff means I
am not in full control of how i get stuff. OR, i just go with source for 29 when it comes
out and wait for the OS dist to catch up. That might be the path of least resistance, but
i think i still need to resolve my EPEL issues with my sysadmins.
What is it exactly that you are not seeing in the EPEL repos that you are expecting to
see?
I never answered this question - I just heard back from my sysadmins and they have
determined
there was a problem with our outbound proxy config which prevented us from seeing the
fedora people
updates - so now i don’t need to build from source any more as i can see 1.2.11.29 - as i
said, it was a
local problem.
and, FYI - i have already deployed .29 to our test environment and it appears to have
corrected all of
our existing problems except for what is documented by 47730 - but i can live with turning
off SSL in
console until nss is fixed.
again, thank you so much to all the 389 devs. i continue to recommend 389 as the
directory server
to use above all others because of its lineage, its performance and its support and
community.
/mrg