Sorry, I don't know what the tool does. You may want to ask the tool's
provider the question.
Thanks.
John Trump wrote:
I am running RHEL 6. Why does the scan show the vulnerabilities on the
port that directory administration server is using?
On May 28, 2014 8:25 PM, "Noriko Hosoi" <nhosoi(a)redhat.com
<mailto:nhosoi@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hello, as you mentioned, all of the CVEs are quite old (older than
RHEL-6). For instance, the last one CVE-2009-1956 was fixed in
apr-util-1.2.7-7.el5_3.1. As long as you use RHEL-6, the CVEs you
listed are all fixed. Also, please note that the CVEs are all
httpd related, not 389-ds.
CVE:
CVE-2008-0005
CVE-2007-6388
CVE-2007-6422
CVE-2007-6420
CVE-2007-5000
CVE-2007-6421
CVE-2008-1678
CVE-2007-1862
CVE-2007-3847
CVE-2007-3304
CVE-2006-5752
CVE-2007-1863
CVE-2009-1891
CVE-2009-1955
CVE-2009-1191
CVE-2009-0023
CVE-2009-1956
CVE-2009-1195
CVE-2009-1890
John Trump wrote:
> I have a system running 389-ds that was scanned using retna.
> Retna showed vulnerabilities which are fairly old. Can anyone
> confirm that these were fixed. Only thing using port 9830 is the
> admin-serv. Below are the rpm versions I have installed and the
> CVE's retna supposidly detected.
>
> 389-adminutil-1.1.19-1.el6.x86_64
> 389-ds-console-doc-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch
> 389-admin-1.1.35-1.el6.x86_64
> 389-admin-console-1.1.8-5.fc19.noarch
> 389-console-1.1.7-1.el6.noarch
> 389-ds-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch
> 389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.25-1.el6.x86_64
> 389-ds-base-1.2.11.25-1.el6.x86_64
> 389-dsgw-1.1.11-1.el6.x86_64
> 389-ds-console-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch
> 389-admin-console-doc-1.1.8-5.fc19.noarch
>
> Audit ID:6310Vul ID:N/A
> Risk Level:Medium
> Sev Code:Category II
> PCI Level:Medium (Fail) - CVSS Score
> CVSS Score:5 [AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P]
> BugTraq ID27234,26838,27236,27237
> CVE:CVE-2008-0005,CVE-2007-6388,CVE-2007-6422,CVE-2007-64
> 20,CVE-2007-5000,CVE-2007-6421,CVE-2008-1678
> CCE:N/A
> Exploit:No
> IAV:N/A
> STIG:
> Context:TCP:9830
> Result:Success
> Tested Value:BR T WB Server:
> (Apache(\([[]^)]*\))?/((2\.((2(\.[[]0-7])?)|(0(\.([[]1-5]?[[]0-9]|6[[]0-2]))
> ?)|(1(\..*)?)))|(1\.((3(\.([[]1-3]?[[]0-9]|40))?)|([[]0-2](\..*)?)))|(0+\..*))
> ($|[[]^0-9.]([[]^(]*\([[]^R][[]^)]*\))*[[]^()]*$))
> Found Value:Server: Apache/2.2##Content-Length: 301##Connection:
> close##Content-Type: text/html;
> charset[=]iso-8859-1####<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
> "-//IETF//DTD HTML
2.0//EN">#<html><head>#<title>404 Not
> Found</title>#</head><body>#<h1>Not Found</h1>
> (truncated...)
>
> Audit ID:6059Vul ID:N/A
> Risk Level:Medium
> Sev Code:Category II
> PCI Level:Medium (Fail) - CVSS Score
> CVSS Score:5 [AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N]
> BugTraq ID24215,24645,25489,24649,24553
> CVE:CVE-2007-1862,CVE-2007-3847,CVE-2007-3304,CVE-2006-57
> 52,CVE-2007-1863
> CCE:N/A
> Exploit:No
> IAV:N/A
> STIG:
> Context:TCP:9830
> Result:Success
> Tested Value:RR T WB
> (Apache(\([[]^)]*\))?/(2\.2(\.[[]0-5])?)($|[[]^0-9.]([[]^(]*\([[]^R][[]^)]*\)
> )*[[]^()]*$))
> Found Value:Apache/2.2
>
> Audit ID:9820Vul ID:N/A
> Risk Level:Medium
> Sev Code:Category II
> PCI Level:High (Fail) - CVSS Score
> CVSS Score:7.8 [AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C]
> BugTraq ID35565,35253,35623,35251,34663,35221,35115
> CVE:CVE-2009-1891,CVE-2009-1955,CVE-2009-1191,CVE-2009-00
> 23,CVE-2009-1956,CVE-2009-1195,CVE-2009-1890
> CCE:N/A
> Exploit:Yes
> IAV:N/A
> STIG:
> Context:TCP:9830
> Result:Success
> Tested Value:APACHE(-ADVANCEDEXTRANETSERVER)?/2\.2(\.(1[[]01]|[[]0
> -9])(\.[[]0-9]+)*)?($|[[]^0-9.])
> Found Value:APACHE/2.2
>
>
>
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users