[SSSD-users] s sssd version

Daniel Jung mimianddaniel at gmail.com
Fri May 23 14:59:57 UTC 2014


awesome.  i will test out it out in our environment using 1.5 for centos 5
and latest package avail on centos 6.

cheers
On May 23, 2014 1:40 AM, "Jakub Hrozek" <jhrozek at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 01:55:44PM -0700, Daniel Jung wrote:
> > Hi Jakub,
> >
> > I was curious on how the servers with same priority with weights were
> > implemented, the wording in RFC on this algorithm was a bit hard to
> > visualize for me and whether this was strictly followed.
>
> You can see the implementation of the weight selection here:
>
> https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/sssd.git/tree/src/resolv/async_resolv.c#n2055
>
> Even if you're not a C programmer, maybe the comments will show how we
> follow the RFC. The intent of the code is to share the load from several
> clients according to the sum of the weights on the same priority level.
> So if you had two servers A and B with the same priority with weights
> of 70 and 30 respectively, 70% of clients should select server A and 30%
> should select server B.
>
> > Also, at which
> > timeout setting is applied for cases where selected server is not
> reachable
> > and next server is selected and connected?
> > Would this be same timeout
> > setting when using multiple servers with URI instead of DN?
>
> There are several timeouts at play, depending on how exactly the server
> is unreachable and what the provider is. For DNS resolution itself,
> dns_resolver_timeout is applied. Once you have an IP address and start
> connecting to an LDAP server, we try for ldap_network_timeout seconds.
>
> There are different timeouts for Kerberos, you can see them all in the
> sssd-ldap and sssd-krb5 man pages.
>
> >
> > Thanks for all the information.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:01:42PM -0700, Daniel Jung wrote:
> > > > thanks for the response guys. just one more question on the topic of
> SRV
> > > > records, does sssd implementation folllow srv rfc closely?  would i
> need
> > > to
> > > > dig into the code to find this?
> > >
> > > As far as I know it does, the code was modeled after the RFC. Is there
> > > any particular functionality that you are concerned about?
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > sssd-users mailing list
> > > sssd-users at lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users
> > >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > sssd-users mailing list
> > sssd-users at lists.fedorahosted.org
> > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-users mailing list
> sssd-users at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-users/attachments/20140523/6f31e1b3/attachment.html>


More information about the sssd-users mailing list