[SSSD] Design discussion: Wildcard Data Provider requests

Pavel Březina pbrezina at redhat.com
Tue Mar 10 12:11:00 UTC 2015


On 03/10/2015 11:33 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:37:51AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
>> On 03/10/2015 10:26 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:18:23AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
>>>>> Sound like you prefer a single option?
>>>>
>>>> Single option, no inheritance. If the option will not be present in [domain]
>>>> than a default value will be used there.
>>>
>>> Fair enough, I also think the default should be 0 (unlimited) or a
>>> /very/ high value (thousands).
>>>
>>> Do you have other default in mind?
>>
>> Dmitri spoke about fifty per IFP due to its use cases... but yes, I think we
>> can go much higher. I'd say hundreds instead thousands. The point is not to
>> have another enumeration mechanism.
>>
>
> Well, I forgot that previously we thought of a good default value -- 1000
> entries, which is typically a singla page :-)
>
> Can you ack:
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/DBusUsersAndGroups?action=diff&version=5&old_version=4
> and:
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/WildcardRefresh?action=diff&version=4&old_version=3

Ack to both.




More information about the sssd-devel mailing list