[SSSD] Design discussion: Wildcard Data Provider requests

Jakub Hrozek jhrozek at redhat.com
Tue Mar 10 10:33:25 UTC 2015


On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:37:51AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 03/10/2015 10:26 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:18:23AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>>Sound like you prefer a single option?
> >>
> >>Single option, no inheritance. If the option will not be present in [domain]
> >>than a default value will be used there.
> >
> >Fair enough, I also think the default should be 0 (unlimited) or a
> >/very/ high value (thousands).
> >
> >Do you have other default in mind?
> 
> Dmitri spoke about fifty per IFP due to its use cases... but yes, I think we
> can go much higher. I'd say hundreds instead thousands. The point is not to
> have another enumeration mechanism.
> 

Well, I forgot that previously we thought of a good default value -- 1000
entries, which is typically a singla page :-)

Can you ack:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/DBusUsersAndGroups?action=diff&version=5&old_version=4
and:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/WildcardRefresh?action=diff&version=4&old_version=3



More information about the sssd-devel mailing list