[SSSD] [PATCH v2] Add basic support for CI test execution
Nikolai Kondrashov
Nikolai.Kondrashov at redhat.com
Wed Jun 25 19:36:21 UTC 2014
On 06/25/2014 10:27 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (25/06/14 22:04), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>> On 06/25/2014 09:54 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>> On (25/06/14 21:45), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Please find attached v2 of the CI patch.
>>>>
>>>> This version pulls Red Hat distro dependencies from contrib/sssd.spec.in.
>>>> I was able to find a way to do it without resorting to unsafe sudo rules.
>>>>
>>>> As before, I would still prefer to move clang/lcov to the moderate set and
>>>> distcheck/mock to the full set. Is there anyone for/against that?
>>>>
>>>> Examples of full test set output on CI machines:
>>>>
>>>> Debian Testing http://sssd-ci.idm.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com:8080/job/new_private_master_debian_testing/57/console
>>>> Fedora 20 http://sssd-ci.idm.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com:8080/job/new_private_master_fedora20/226/console
>>>> RHEL6 http://sssd-ci.idm.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com:8080/job/new_private_master_rhel6/6/console
>>>> RHEL7 http://sssd-ci.idm.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com:8080/job/new_private_master_rhel7/231/console
>>>>
>>> Do not paste private link to upstream mailing list. It is not the fist time.
>>> It is not open source way.
>>
>> I agree, posting links to internal resources is not very nice (although more
>> useful than not) and will remove them. However, I would say that berating
>> fellow engineers hurts our open source way more.
> If you mean me I will like to see citation, because I have not offended anyone.
I would say the offended is in a better position to conclude that.
> I've just criticised wrong approach. Firstly in constructive way, secondly
> strinct NACK.
The problem is the manner. A "please" wouldn't go amiss. Then, last time was
about a commit message, this time about a message to the maillist, which is
not the same thing.
Sincerely,
Nick
More information about the sssd-devel
mailing list