[SSSD] [PATCH v2] Add basic support for CI test execution

Lukas Slebodnik lslebodn at redhat.com
Wed Jun 25 19:27:36 UTC 2014


On (25/06/14 22:04), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>On 06/25/2014 09:54 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>On (25/06/14 21:45), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>>>Hi everyone,
>>>
>>>Please find attached v2 of the CI patch.
>>>
>>>This version pulls Red Hat distro dependencies from contrib/sssd.spec.in.
>>>I was able to find a way to do it without resorting to unsafe sudo rules.
>>>
>>>As before, I would still prefer to move clang/lcov to the moderate set and
>>>distcheck/mock to the full set. Is there anyone for/against that?
>>>
>>>Examples of full test set output on CI machines:
>>>
>>>Debian Testing  http://sssd-ci.idm.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com:8080/job/new_private_master_debian_testing/57/console
>>>Fedora 20       http://sssd-ci.idm.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com:8080/job/new_private_master_fedora20/226/console
>>>RHEL6           http://sssd-ci.idm.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com:8080/job/new_private_master_rhel6/6/console
>>>RHEL7           http://sssd-ci.idm.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com:8080/job/new_private_master_rhel7/231/console
>>>
>>Do not paste private link to upstream mailing list. It is not the fist time.
>>It is not open source way.
>
>I agree, posting links to internal resources is not very nice (although more
>useful than not) and will remove them. However, I would say that berating
>fellow engineers hurts our open source way more.
If you mean me I will like to see citation, because I have not offended anyone.
I've just criticised wrong approach. Firstly in constructive way, secondly
strinct NACK.

LS



More information about the sssd-devel mailing list