[SSSD] [INI] Ding-libs, controversial points in the design to allow merging configuration snippets

Dmitri Pal dpal at redhat.com
Sun Apr 13 13:23:50 UTC 2014


On 04/12/2014 01:05 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (07/04/14 19:20), Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> Next week I am traveling, I will have some time to do prototyping
>> while I am flying so I want to get to consensus before the end of the
>> week.
>>
> This was a very long thread and I read it briefly.
> If you have a spare time and want to implement features in ding-libs
> it will be better to implement validation.
>
> It is a pain to modify sssd.conf (from ipa-client-install POV)
> and it would be great to have configuration divided into small files.
> On the other hand, modification of sssd.conf is already implemented in
> ipa-client-install, but we do not have a validation. The validation of
> configuration file will save our time (troubleshooting users problem on IRC)
> and it was already requested by customers (downstream)
>
> LS
But it is a much bigger scope than merge.
I want to be done with merge first.

-- 
Thank you,
Dmitri Pal

Sr. Engineering Manager IdM portfolio
Red Hat, Inc.




More information about the sssd-devel mailing list