[SSSD] [PATCH 0/4]: Actual memory cache implementation

Dmitri Pal dpal at redhat.com
Tue Jan 10 15:59:28 UTC 2012


On 01/10/2012 10:17 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 10:49 +0100, Jan Zelený wrote:
>
>> I also have one cosmetic proposal for patch #0009:
>>
>> 1) On line 452 use MC_ALIGN64 instead of (n_elem + 7) & (~7)
> The reason I did not use MC_ALIGN64 is that I thought it would be
> confusing as n_elem is not a pointer but a counter.
> I'll change the code and add more explanation on why using MC_ALIGN64 is
> ok there.
>
> Simo.
>
As there any SELinux implication with this feature?

-- 
Thank you,
Dmitri Pal

Sr. Engineering Manager IPA project,
Red Hat Inc.


-------------------------------
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/






More information about the sssd-devel mailing list