[SSSD] [PATCH 0/4]: Actual memory cache implementation
Simo Sorce
simo at redhat.com
Tue Jan 10 15:17:28 UTC 2012
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 10:49 +0100, Jan Zelený wrote:
> I also have one cosmetic proposal for patch #0009:
>
> 1) On line 452 use MC_ALIGN64 instead of (n_elem + 7) & (~7)
The reason I did not use MC_ALIGN64 is that I thought it would be
confusing as n_elem is not a pointer but a counter.
I'll change the code and add more explanation on why using MC_ALIGN64 is
ok there.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
More information about the sssd-devel
mailing list