[SSSD] Man pages should mention supported providers

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Wed Oct 13 12:03:01 UTC 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/04/2010 07:38 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 09/29/2010 06:40 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
>> Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 09/13/2010 04:59 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
>>>> Supported providers are mentioned in Description section, because there
>>>> was already partial description present. Another possibility was to
>>>> comment it as configuration option (e.g. create access_provider=ldap
>>>> record there). I like this way more, but I'm not sure whether it is
>>>> descriptive enough.
>>>
>>> Nack.
>>>
>>> I don't really like that we're explicitly mentioning that there is no
>>> access provider for Kerberos (since we have
>>> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/618 open to create one). Can you
>>> change it to be just a positive list of the providers it currently
>>> supports? (auth and chpass).
>>>
>>> Also, you should mention the chpass providers for both IPA and LDAP as
>>> well.
> 
>> Updated patch is in attachment.
> 
>> Jan
> 
> Ack.
> 

Pushed to master.

- -- 
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761

Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAky1n/UACgkQeiVVYja6o6NBugCeNO6uUqVeOqPrP9S7Jb/uusi/
TRoAoI3dmgvqcv0muMRKzsFxIXR+XrH0
=o+1s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the sssd-devel mailing list