[SSSD] Man pages should mention supported providers

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Mon Oct 4 11:38:17 UTC 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/29/2010 06:40 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 09/13/2010 04:59 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
>>> Supported providers are mentioned in Description section, because there
>>> was already partial description present. Another possibility was to
>>> comment it as configuration option (e.g. create access_provider=ldap
>>> record there). I like this way more, but I'm not sure whether it is
>>> descriptive enough.
>>
>> Nack.
>>
>> I don't really like that we're explicitly mentioning that there is no
>> access provider for Kerberos (since we have
>> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/618 open to create one). Can you
>> change it to be just a positive list of the providers it currently
>> supports? (auth and chpass).
>>
>> Also, you should mention the chpass providers for both IPA and LDAP as
>> well.
> 
> Updated patch is in attachment.
> 
> Jan

Ack.

- -- 
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761

Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkypvKkACgkQeiVVYja6o6PJbACbB8+Vj+agdjIB5ASdmqyqLCj1
u14An0urkq5QQXX93PYZIxTTN+zQaYXy
=RFyh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the sssd-devel mailing list