[SSSD] Documenting the SSSD local domain, management tools, etc
Jakub Hrozek
jhrozek at redhat.com
Wed May 19 08:51:07 UTC 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/19/2010 01:04 AM, David O'Brien wrote:
> Recently it was recommended that I not include the LOCAL domain, nested
> groups, and related functionality in the end-user doc (limiting it to
> the man pages). This raises the following issue:
>
> There is a section in the draft doc at present, "Using the SSSD
> Management Tools", which includes info on working with users, groups,
> nested groups, examples, etc., all of which will disappear if we remove
> LOCAL domains from the topic list. Is this what we want? I know we're
> moving towards the "SSSD functions transparently in the b/g when needed"
> approach, but I want to double-check before I remove this section (about
> 2 pages).
>
> Thanks
Right now the local domain plus the management tools are usable
primarily for testing, their only benefit is nested groups.
I vote for not documenting them in the deployment guide, but leaving the
documentation in the SSSD sources (manpages, config file example..)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkvzpnsACgkQHsardTLnvCVTvACdGEo8iBd1whobU/1oVFpeErzn
N/cAn3a4pK2lfwmOvp02gtKHGk4GoPOO
=b5K2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the sssd-devel
mailing list