[SSSD] New Try to build SSSD on Karmic both as of 2009.08.04

Simo Sorce ssorce at redhat.com
Tue Aug 11 10:09:24 UTC 2009


On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 17:22 -0400, Mathias Gug wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Stephen Gallagher<sgallagh at redhat.com> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 08/07/2009 10:40 AM, Miguel P.C. wrote:
> >> Hi again,
> >>
> >>> International testing is always a good thing. On a related note, if you
> >>> would like to try your hand at translating the SSSD tools to Spanish,
> >>> feel free to send a patch for the server/po/es.po (you need to first run
> >>> 'make dist' to have it update the es.po to match the current source files.
> >>
> >> That sounds like something I could add to my TODO list.
> >> May I suggest that, if we want to multiply the number of people
> >> translating SSSD, we can use Rosetta in Launchpad to do so. I still
> >> dont know hot to import ".po" into it or how to get the results from
> >> there but ... the translating teams behind it (I'm part of one), work
> >> really nice and are really accurate (although this means terrible
> >> discussions on one single word in the mailing lists, hehehe).
> >> I do appreciate the effort you are doing and maybe your policy does
> >> not let you do so but, I think is something worth considering.
> >> One thrid option, now that Launchpad is Open/Free Software you can set
> >> up a "Rosetta" for the project.
> >>
> >> Sorry if I'm adding too much noise to this thread but, as I said, I
> >> think it's worth considering.
> >>
> >
> > Well, we're definitely open to expanding out translation community. Our
> > original plan was to use Fedora's Transifex system, but it doesn't mesh
> > with our development style. (Transifex requires direct access to our
> > upstream repository, while we prefer to receive everything in patches
> > that must be approved by a gatekeeper such as Simo, Sumit or myself).
> >
> > The latest upstream release of Transifex supposedly has support for
> > patch-generation instead of repository-integration, but there is no
> > clear view when the Fedora Infrastructure will upgrade.
> >
> > Does Rosetta have support for generating patches for upstream, or does
> > it require repository integration?
> >
> 
> Launchpad Translations does not generate patches automatically, but it
> allows for translations to be automatically commited to a bzr branch
> (http://blog.launchpad.net/general/exporting-translations-to-a-bazaar-branch),
>  where they can then be fetched from and integrated to the upstream
> project. It seems to me that this could work well with your workflow,
> where only the reviewers or gatekeepers can approve the changes.
> 
> The main benefit of Launchpad Translations though, is that it allows
> building and growing translation communities by lowering the entry
> barrier for translators and allowing them to work in a collaborative
> way.

Given we use git it doesn't seem a great match.
If the Fedora facility do upgrade to the newer Transifex, then maybe
that's going to be easier for us as we will not need to make any bzr to
git transformation and use 2 separate account systems, etc...

Simo.




More information about the sssd-devel mailing list