Aug29 Benchmarks

Jeffrey Blank blank at eclipse.ncsc.mil
Tue Sep 3 03:39:39 UTC 2013


Although the check-combining script is a 76-line python script,
confusion about the "Duplicate ID" messages (which are notifications,
not errors) seems to persist so I have yet again adjusted the output
text.  A more elegant solution would be to verify the elements'
equivalence, but I was so disappointed that lxml did not have a method
to do so I did not code it up.

I can't help you with the SCC error, however.

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Robert Sanders <rsanders at trustedcs.com> wrote:
> I just did a fresh git clone and tried myself and also got errors.
>
> After dropping in to the RHEl6 directory the 'make' had 3 warnings about 'Duplicate ID, which will not be added: var_accounts_user_umask'.
> When I zipped up the final ssg* products and dropping this into SCC 3.1GA and ran ./cscc I got the following:
>
> RH64-64: Loading ssg-rhel6-xccdf.xml
> [ERROR] Profile 'rht-ccp' is an abstract profile.
>     Target System RH64-64
>     Selected Profile:  rht-ccp
>     Stream Name:  ssg-rhel6-
>     Stream Version:    0.9
>    Stream Date   2013-08-30
>
> Total Errors: 1
> ...
>
>
> Hope everyone enjoys the long weekend....
>
> -Rob
>
> ________________________________________
> From: scap-security-guide-bounces at lists.fedorahosted.org [scap-security-guide-bounces at lists.fedorahosted.org] on behalf of Moessbauer, David [david.moessbauer at progeny.net]
> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 1:54 PM
> To: scap-security-guide at lists.fedorahosted.org
> Subject: Aug29 Benchmarks
>
> Shawn,
>
> Downloaded the latest benchmarks zip from your buildroot site and have loaded/run them in SCAP 3.1 (as well as 3.1.1.RC6) and they do not seem to complete.
>
> They get to a point where the following is displayed, but they don't actually seem to complete:
>
>   >> LOCALHOST.LOCALDOMAIN: Getting detail for package: 1655 of 1655
>   >> LOCALHOST.LOCALDOMAIN: Finish getting package details
>   >> LOCALHOST.LOCALDOMAIN:    for object:  oval:ssg:obj:1991
>
> Is this a known issue?
>
> Thoughts?
>
> v/r
>
> David Moessbauer
> (410) 627-5633 (M)
>
> The Information contained in or attached to this communication may be confidential and privileged proprietary intended only for the individual/s or entity to whom/which it is addressed. Any unauthorized use, distribution, copying or disclosure of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please contact the sender immediately and delete from your system.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: scap-security-guide-bounces at lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:scap-security-guide-bounces at lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of Shawn Wells
> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 1:20 PM
> To: scap-security-guide at lists.fedorahosted.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] OVAL template testing
>
> On 8/30/13 1:09 PM, Jeffrey Blank wrote:
>> These all look good to me -- please push.
>
> Pushed
>
>
> --
> Shawn Wells
> Director, Innovation Programs
> shawn at redhat.com | 443.534.0130
> @shawndwells
>
> _______________________________________________
> scap-security-guide mailing list
> scap-security-guide at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
> _______________________________________________
> scap-security-guide mailing list
> scap-security-guide at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
> _______________________________________________
> scap-security-guide mailing list
> scap-security-guide at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide


More information about the scap-security-guide mailing list