[PATCH 0/1] Added 800-53 content to partition rules.

Willy Santos wsantos at redhat.com
Thu Apr 26 19:41:07 UTC 2012


Pushed, Thanks!

Willy Santos, RHCE
Consultant
Red Hat Consulting
Cell: +1 (301) 254-7077
Email: wsantos at redhat.com


On 04/26/2012 03:19 PM, Jeffrey Blank wrote:
> I ACK this too.
>
> While the CCIs will likely cover a lot of the Rules (and implicitly
> provide 800-53), some might not be covered.  So, direct mapping to
> 800-53 may have a longer lifespan for some rules.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On 04/26/2012 02:46 PM, Willy Santos wrote:
>> This commit was missed this morning when others of the kind got
>> committed and ACKd by Shawn Wells. In the interest of preserving this
>> information and working from the the same base, I'm submitting for ACK.
>> See Shawn's commment below on the previous ACK:
>>
>> "Given that we're converting the mappings from NIST over to the CCIs
>> (which get us things like NIST 800-53 and OS SRG for free) these patches
>> will have a short lifespan, however they do provide us with a foundation
>> for identifying what potential CCIs the rules apply to. Ack for the
>> patchset, so that these can provide a base for mapping to appropriate
>> CCIs."
>>
>>
>> Willy Santos (1):
>>    Added 800-53 references where missing.
>>
>>   rhel6/src/input/system/permissions/partitions.xml |   14 +++++++-------
>>   1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> scap-security-guide mailing list
>> scap-security-guide at lists.fedorahosted.org
>> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
> _______________________________________________
> scap-security-guide mailing list
> scap-security-guide at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide


More information about the scap-security-guide mailing list