No concept of a platform?

Heiko Braun ike.braun at googlemail.com
Thu Jan 8 16:19:30 UTC 2015


I think i’ve found it:
https://developer.jboss.org/en/rhq/next



> On 08 Jan 2015, at 17:14, Heiko Braun <ike.braun at googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
> I did refer to wf-core to point to the base capabilities of wildfly. Nothing  prevents you from building upon the full EE server (wildfly), although you probably won’t need all the stock components. 
> 
> But what you say about Hawkular is interesting. I wasn’t aware of this effort until Mazz brought it forward. Listening to what you say Jay, it seems I confused rhq.metrics with rhq.next. 
> 
> Can you point me to some documentation about the architecture and design decisions behind rhq.next?  Is it correct to say that rhq.next  will leverage some of the rhq.metrics components? 
> 
> Regards, HeikoB
> 
>> On 08 Jan 2015, at 16:54, Jay Shaughnessy <jshaughn at redhat.com <mailto:jshaughn at redhat.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> HeikoB, as for Wildfly-core, we haven't really used that afaik, just using Wildfly at this point because I'm not sure Wildfly-core was quite ready last time we looked.  Has that changed?   I assume wfly-core is much lighter that wfly, and that is the main advantage, giving up the J2EE EAR/WAR support. etc.  Perhaps both wfly-core and wfly proper will both play a role going forward.
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/rhq-devel/attachments/20150108/49edfae1/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the rhq-devel mailing list