No concept of a platform?

Heiko Braun ike.braun at googlemail.com
Thu Jan 8 16:14:26 UTC 2015


I did refer to wf-core to point to the base capabilities of wildfly. Nothing  prevents you from building upon the full EE server (wildfly), although you probably won’t need all the stock components. 

But what you say about Hawkular is interesting. I wasn’t aware of this effort until Mazz brought it forward. Listening to what you say Jay, it seems I confused rhq.metrics with rhq.next. 

Can you point me to some documentation about the architecture and design decisions behind rhq.next?  Is it correct to say that rhq.next  will leverage some of the rhq.metrics components? 

Regards, HeikoB

> On 08 Jan 2015, at 16:54, Jay Shaughnessy <jshaughn at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> HeikoB, as for Wildfly-core, we haven't really used that afaik, just using Wildfly at this point because I'm not sure Wildfly-core was quite ready last time we looked.  Has that changed?   I assume wfly-core is much lighter that wfly, and that is the main advantage, giving up the J2EE EAR/WAR support. etc.  Perhaps both wfly-core and wfly proper will both play a role going forward.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/rhq-devel/attachments/20150108/33f8fc49/attachment.html>


More information about the rhq-devel mailing list