[rhq.next] Order of elements in pom.xml files

Thomas Segismont tsegismo at redhat.com
Tue Dec 2 08:02:37 UTC 2014


Le 01/12/2014 19:14, mike thompson a écrit :
>
>> On 1 Dec 2014, at 09:00, Peter Palaga <ppalaga at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi *,
>>
>> Apache has a convention [1] for $subj and there is a handy tidy-maven-plugin [2] to fix the poms.
>>
>> It is often practical to have convention like this in place - esp. when searching for a particular element in a pom file.
>>
>> Therefore, I'd like to propose to adopt this convention in rhq.next projects. I would not enforce it at build time for now, I'd just reorder all poms and document it at some appropriate place. WDYT?
>
> +1 on anything that programmatically enforces coding conventions. [Especially as more community members commit].

+1

>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> [1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/conventions/code.html#POM_Code_Convention
>> [2] http://mojo.codehaus.org/tidy-maven-plugin/
>> _______________________________________________
>> rhq-devel mailing list
>> rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhq-devel mailing list
> rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
>



More information about the rhq-devel mailing list