RawConfigurations?
John Sanda
jsanda at redhat.com
Mon Nov 18 03:05:21 UTC 2013
On Nov 17, 2013, at 6:32 PM, John Mazzitelli <mazz at redhat.com> wrote:
> raw config is used no where.
>
> however, it was a really cool idea - it would be nice to try to bring it back. But it is not a trivial task to implement it properly (as evidence by the fact that we put alot of effort into it during imanage and still never finished).
True it is a non-trivial task; however, there were some non-technical issues that only made things that much more difficult. Issue # 1 - imanage, issue # 2 - imanage :) Ad then we also had a couple lead engineers argue passionately for several days about what I think was a minor design detail. The standoff lasted long enough that the director at the time was brought in to settle the issue. Ah, the good ole days….
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On Nov 17, 2013, at 9:12 AM, Heiko W.Rupp <hrupp at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> do we use raw configurations anywhere? I know where they came from,
>>> but are they in use today or can we imagine using them in the (hear)
>>> future?
>>>
>>> Heiko
>>>
>>
>> I do not believe raw config is used anywhere.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rhq-devel mailing list
>> rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> rhq-devel mailing list
> rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
More information about the rhq-devel
mailing list