GitHub migration again -- The Plan

Heiko W.Rupp hrupp at redhat.com
Fri Mar 1 11:18:27 UTC 2013


Am 01.03.2013 um 09:06 schrieb Lukas Krejci:

> I don't think we need to multiply all the jobs by 3. For example, we have a 

Another example is the compile job, that currently runs for
Postgres and Oracle, which is redundant

> plugin. Basically we need to start thinking about the core server as a 
> standalone project.

We can also go the full mile:

split out modules/core into a separate repo.
If we make changes there, we publish a new version of it and 
all the other 3 repos will build agains this published version of modules/core/*

> While this change will slow down the progress somewhat, I think it's worth it 
> - we will have more fine grained micro releases that will actually track the 
> progress in the core.

We may/will see some slowdown as well, if we go more to a pull-request 
model of contributing. In both cases we would think a little harder if a 
change is really needed and if the change is the right one.

-- 
Reg. Adresse: Red Hat GmbH, Technopark II, Haus C, 
Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 14, D-85630 Grasbrunn
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht München HRB 153243
Geschaeftsführer:  Mark Hegarty, Charlie Peters, Michael Cunningham, Charles Cachera

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/rhq-devel/attachments/20130301/b128c318/attachment.sig>


More information about the rhq-devel mailing list