GitHub migration again -- The Plan
Heiko W.Rupp
hrupp at redhat.com
Fri Mar 1 11:18:27 UTC 2013
Am 01.03.2013 um 09:06 schrieb Lukas Krejci:
> I don't think we need to multiply all the jobs by 3. For example, we have a
Another example is the compile job, that currently runs for
Postgres and Oracle, which is redundant
> plugin. Basically we need to start thinking about the core server as a
> standalone project.
We can also go the full mile:
split out modules/core into a separate repo.
If we make changes there, we publish a new version of it and
all the other 3 repos will build agains this published version of modules/core/*
> While this change will slow down the progress somewhat, I think it's worth it
> - we will have more fine grained micro releases that will actually track the
> progress in the core.
We may/will see some slowdown as well, if we go more to a pull-request
model of contributing. In both cases we would think a little harder if a
change is really needed and if the change is the right one.
--
Reg. Adresse: Red Hat GmbH, Technopark II, Haus C,
Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 14, D-85630 Grasbrunn
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht München HRB 153243
Geschaeftsführer: Mark Hegarty, Charlie Peters, Michael Cunningham, Charles Cachera
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/rhq-devel/attachments/20130301/b128c318/attachment.sig>
More information about the rhq-devel
mailing list