Enterpriser Server Jar Naming - Fix

Heiko W.Rupp hrupp at redhat.com
Thu Jul 18 14:48:08 UTC 2013


Am 18.07.2013 um 16:28 schrieb Jay Shaughnessy:

In our context "enterprise" means "on the server" as opposed to plugins or agent or cli, so yes it is sort of redundant too.

> If you want to shorten the module name I don't know why we need "startup".  Why not just org/rhq/rhq-server/main/rhq-server-4.8.0.jar, for example?
> 
Well, I had that in my first iteration 

-                <rhq.deploymentDir>${rhq.containerDir}/modules/org/rhq/rhq-enterprise-server-startup-subsystem/main/deployments/${rhq.deploymentName}</rhq.deploymentDir>
+                <rhq.deploymentDir>${rhq.containerDir}/modules/org/rhq/server/main/deployments/${rhq.deploymentName}</rhq.deploymentDir>
             </properties>

See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983552

The current naming is not cast in stone. And yes perhaps it makes sense to prefix stuff with rhq- to make it more obvious.

  Heiko

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/rhq-devel/attachments/20130718/0297e296/attachment.sig>


More information about the rhq-devel mailing list