Seeing parent resource implies seeing children?

Andreas Dietrich adi at aspicon.de
Tue Nov 15 09:11:56 UTC 2011


... little mistake ... we did not use a Group Definition in this case 
and thus cannot say '... platforms ending with ...', but had to manually 
assign members to the group.

Am 11/15/2011 10:09 AM, schrieb Andreas Dietrich:
> Hi,
>
> we set up a (Mixed) Group and associated this with some user that should
> have e.g. read access to its members.
> Since we could say "only platforms ending with '.company.com'" or
> "platforms ending with '.company.com' + recursive (descendant
> resources)" I would say it's possible to construct anything you like.
>
> The only question is if really everything would finally work properly,
> especially regarding the GUI that seems most of the time dependant on
> the display-tree (with platform root).
>
>
> Regards
> Andreas :-)
>
>
> Am 11/15/2011 08:15 AM, schrieb Heiko W.Rupp:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Question about access rights:
>>
>> When a user can access a resource X, does that always imply he can also see children of X?
>> (The other way obviously does not work)
>>
>> Or can there a case be constructed where the user e.g. only sees a JBAS server, but not its
>> services?
>>
>>    Thanks
>>      Heiko
>>
> _______________________________________________
> rhq-devel mailing list
> rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel


More information about the rhq-devel mailing list