RFC: Next release number

Bryan Kearney bkearney at redhat.com
Wed Dec 16 13:10:27 UTC 2009


Where does the zero show up?

- bk

On 12/15/2009 11:09 AM, John Mazzitelli wrote:
> On 12/15/2009 11:06 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
>> Any comments / issue with the next build being
>>
>> 3.0.0.1
>> 3.0.0 Build 1?
>>
>> We can drop the B notation, and add a GA when we need to. This should
>> alleviate any isues with Jopr / RHQ numbering conflicts.
>
> One problem we still have is the fact that we no longer have a true
> "Build Number" in our build artifacts (and this is important when it
> comes to the agent auto-update feature).
>
> We used to use the svn revision number and we used the maven plugin that
> helped stamp svn revision #s in our build artifacts.
>
> Now that we are git, we need something else. SHAs are not monotonically
> increasing, so I don't know if we use them. Perhaps we just have a maven
> property that we manually increment in the root pom.xml (like we do for
> the db upgrade version in the dbutils pom).
>
> Right now, we always have a build number of "0" which is not what we want.
> _______________________________________________
> rhq-devel mailing list
> rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel



More information about the rhq-devel mailing list