RFC: use PG_ComputerSystem instead of Linux_ComputerSystem

Jan Safranek jsafrane at redhat.com
Fri Oct 4 09:59:24 UTC 2013


On 10/04/2013 10:56 AM, Devchandra L Meetei wrote:
> Going through your mail, Just went back and check the pegasus code
> 
> and did few adjustment to to reflect the name properly(Though the
> particluar provider serves CIM_computerSystem, PG_ComputerSystem and
> CIM_UnitaryComputerSysteM).
> 
> [root at localhost pegasus]# cimcli gi PG_computersystem
> 1: PG_ComputerSystem.CreationClassName="PG_ComputerSystem",Name="localhost"
> Select an Instance (1..1)? ^C
> [root at localhost pegasus]# cimcli ei PG_computersystem
> 
> // path=
> PG_ComputerSystem.CreationClassName="PG_ComputerSystem",Name="localhost"
> 
> instance of PG_ComputerSystem
> {
>     Caption = "Computer System";
>     Description = "Linux version 2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64
> (mockbuild at x86-022.build.eng.bos.redhat.com
> <mailto:mockbuild at x86-022.build.eng.bos.redhat.com>) "
>         "(gcc version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-3) (GCC) ) #1 SMP "
>         "Tue Jan 29 11:47:41 EST 2013";
>     ElementName = "Computer System";
>     OperationalStatus = {2};
>     Status = "OK";
>     CreationClassName = "PG_ComputerSystem";
>     Name = "localhost";
>     NameFormat = "Other";
>     PowerManagementCapabilities = {1};
>     PowerManagementSupported = FALSE;
>     PowerState = 1;
> };
> [root at localhost pegasus]# cimcli ni PG_computersystem
> PG_ComputerSystem.CreationClassName="PG_ComputerSystem",Name="localhost"
> [root at localhost pegasus]#
> 
> Will fix as a bug in 2.14(Will update the bug number later, Do openlmi
> need this to be backported?

No, we don't need it backported. Thanks for the quick fix!

Bug is http://bugzilla.openpegasus.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9795

Jan



More information about the openlmi-devel mailing list