openlmi-scripts license
Stephen Gallagher
sgallagh at redhat.com
Mon Aug 5 10:20:10 UTC 2013
On Aug 5, 2013, at 3:22 AM, Radek Novacek <rnovacek at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon 05 of Aug 2013 9:10:41 Roman Rakus wrote:
>> Any consensus?
>>
>> I'm going to write scripts, licensed under LGPLv2+ or BSD (2-clause
>> license as described on wikipedia [1])
>>
>> RR
>>
>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses
>
> I don't see any advantage in using dual licensing, it's just mess. Everyone
> making changes will take the BSD license because it's giving him more freedom
> - he can use it even with *GPL* code.
>
> I would suggest using BSD-style license only in order to simplify adoption of
> the scripts.
>
I agree. Let's just go with BSD 2-clause.
More information about the openlmi-devel
mailing list