openlmi-scripts license

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Mon Aug 5 10:20:10 UTC 2013



On Aug 5, 2013, at 3:22 AM, Radek Novacek <rnovacek at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon 05 of Aug 2013 9:10:41 Roman Rakus wrote:
>> Any consensus?
>> 
>> I'm going to write scripts, licensed under LGPLv2+ or BSD (2-clause
>> license as described on wikipedia [1])
>> 
>> RR
>> 
>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses
> 
> I don't see any advantage in using dual licensing, it's just mess. Everyone 
> making changes will take the BSD license because it's giving him more freedom 
> - he can use it even with *GPL* code.
> 
> I would suggest using BSD-style license only in order to simplify adoption of 
> the scripts.
> 

I agree. Let's just go with BSD 2-clause.


More information about the openlmi-devel mailing list