openlmi-scripts license

Radek Novacek rnovacek at redhat.com
Mon Aug 5 07:22:47 UTC 2013


On Mon 05 of Aug 2013 9:10:41 Roman Rakus wrote:
> Any consensus?
> 
> I'm going to write scripts, licensed under LGPLv2+ or BSD (2-clause
> license as described on wikipedia [1])
> 
> RR
> 
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses

I don't see any advantage in using dual licensing, it's just mess. Everyone 
making changes will take the BSD license because it's giving him more freedom 
- he can use it even with *GPL* code.

I would suggest using BSD-style license only in order to simplify adoption of 
the scripts.

Radek Novacek


More information about the openlmi-devel mailing list