[copyleft-next] Network access to Corresponding Source
Stephen Michael Kellat
skellat at fastmail.net
Sat Feb 9 19:56:34 UTC 2013
On 02/09/2013 02:14 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 01:31:45PM -0500, Stephen Michael Kellat wrote:
>> "Corresponding source shall be accessible via non-proprietary means of
>> access without charge, need for identity verification, or user traffic
>> logging."
> I'm not so sure about the last clause. What precisely qualifies as
> "user traffic logging"? Some people might think IP addresses might
> qualify.
I agree. That's a bit of inartful drafting on my part.
>
> The goal here is to prevent requiring a user acount, right? Wouldn't
> "identity verification" be sufficient?
Not sure. If I understand Joshua's concerns, he does not want user
accounts involved. I need to think about my thinking on that more in
the meantime.
> Also, while most crypto qualifies these days under the ITAR exemption,
> enough so that we don't think about it, there is still software (such
> as that pertaining to satellites and launch vehicles) which is still
> coverred by ITAR. What if someone, say, in the amateur radio
> community, wants to use open source software in an amateur satellite
> project? I could imagine cases where the software could be freely
> shared within the United States, but due to ITAR regulations, someone
> who tried putting it on an open ftp site would could end up getting
> thrown in jail.
As a duly-licensed amateur radio operator, I am well aware that ITAR
remains an interesting conundrum. For the most part, I'm not aware of
matters of concern under ITAR being released under open source licenses
of any sort. I know at least one satellite going up that has an Arduino
on-board which would have an open source license involved but it seemed
like that was set to be connected only to sensors. See:
http://www.uk.amsat.org/?p=7983
I may need to think of an appropriate inquiry to AMSAT's office in Maryland.
>
> There's some discussions about how the GPL interacts with ITAR here:
>
> http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/dod-oss-qa.html
>
> But if we require that "corresponding source" must _always_ be
> accessible via the network, this might be problemtic for certain use
> cases.
That's going to be an interesting scenario that I do not think we've
approached yet. If anything, ITAR is deserving of its own thread.
Here's my second attempt at a draft:
"Corresponding source shall be accessible without charge or user
verification being required. Access through only a
marketplace/storefront to source may not be mandated."
That's 24 words.
Stephen Michael Kellat
More information about the copyleft-next
mailing list