[copyleft-next] Why was BE rejected as an issue tracker for copyleft-next?
Richard Fontana
fontana at sharpeleven.org
Fri Feb 8 03:40:30 UTC 2013
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:16:17PM -0500, Stephen Michael Kellat wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 10:03 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
> > Richard Fontana wrote:
> >> I am tracking the underlying issue here on github at
> > BTW, could someone please state (or restate) the reasons that
> > http://bugseverywhere.org/ was rejected as an issue tracker for
> > copyleft-next?
> Bradley,
>
> My logs lack reasoning in that regard. If we were to utilize
> BugsEverywhere, we could switch to Fossil SCM which is at least an
> integrated distributed system. See:
> http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki
I remember BugsEverywhere being suggested by someone somewhere
(possibly in a comment to a GitHub issue) but ISTR something about it
was considered suboptimal. In any case I never investigated it or
alternatives.
- RF
More information about the copyleft-next
mailing list