Restricted vs. allowed content

seth vidal skvidal at
Tue Jul 2 12:43:35 UTC 2013

On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:18:19 +0200
Miroslav Suchý <msuchy at> wrote:

> On 07/02/2013 10:55 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > AFAIK we will enforce the same licensing as Fedora (bad licenses
> > stuff can't be built in Copr), other than that no restrictions.
> Hmm, why we can not allow e.g. "W3C Documentation License"? It is bad 
> because "Does not permit modification, different from W3C Software 
> License". Fedora need to do modification from time to time. But we do
> not.
> Or some licenses, which permits commercial use? It is blocker for 
> Fedora. But it is blocker for COPR?

We cannot host the files which are under a license we cannot distribute

As to your specific license requests - you're going to have to take
those to legal at

I'm not a lawyer and I don't even want to be one :)


More information about the copr-devel mailing list