nullable gpgUrl field in Content

Bryan Kearney bkearney at redhat.com
Tue Aug 23 20:45:12 UTC 2011


On 08/23/2011 10:17 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
> On 08/23/2011 09:43 AM, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
>> Is there a reason it should be nullable? Why don't we just mark it NOT NULL?
>> If we expect it to be there, then it should be there.
>>
>
> I have a patch on candlepin patches that converts null values for
> extentions to spaces.. which allows it to work. I would prefer to see
> thatone acked, as opposed to loosing null vs. empty space as this one does.
>
> Hint.. can someone ack that patch?

Patch is in. I owe zeus a unit test.

-- bk



More information about the candlepin mailing list