nullable gpgUrl field in Content

Bryan Kearney bkearney at redhat.com
Tue Aug 23 14:17:08 UTC 2011


On 08/23/2011 09:43 AM, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
> Is there a reason it should be nullable? Why don't we just mark it NOT NULL?
> If we expect it to be there, then it should be there.
>

I have a patch on candlepin patches that converts null values for 
extentions to spaces.. which allows it to work. I would prefer to see 
thatone acked, as opposed to loosing null vs. empty space as this one does.

Hint.. can someone ack that patch?

-- bk



More information about the candlepin mailing list