Buildr/Eclipse Hate Each Other

Bryan Kearney bkearney at redhat.com
Thu Mar 18 18:42:29 UTC 2010


On 03/18/2010 11:47 AM, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Adam Young<ayoung at redhat.com>  wrote:
>> Since you are hating on Maven...something to which I can relate...let me
>> state that we should put all source files in the same tree to begin
>> with, and then exempt things, as opposed to the Maven way of making a
>> zilling subdirs.  I mean really do we need:
>>
>> proxy/src/main/humdedum/java/myjavacode/goesinto/anothersubdir/belowthis/com.....
>
> That's funny you say that, we originally had it set as code/src when we used
> ant. Then I put in buildr and moved everything to the maven style directory
> which is the buildr default (though not a requirement).
>
>> I mean, if JUnit can find all of its tests to execute, can't we find all
>> of the JUnit tests to remove?  OK, maybe that is a bit much, but you get
>> the idea.
>>
>> We chose builder because we didn't want to do Maven.  If that is the
>> decision, lets make it stick:  get rid of the dumb Maven ideas.
>> Simplify the source tree.
>
> I can actually agree with this, though I won't make the change just yet :)
> Even if I simplify the tree, I don't think it will solve the CLI vs eclipse
> issue we are having.
>

I would prefer we hold off on this until the "Do we need this to build 
in Koji" discussion.

-- bk




More information about the candlepin mailing list