[master][PATCH] Return the returned value in the fire_gtk_action
Vratislav Podzimek
vpodzime at redhat.com
Tue Feb 11 13:57:09 UTC 2014
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 07:53 -0500, Anne Mulhern wrote:
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Vratislav Podzimek" <vpodzime at redhat.com>
> > To: anaconda-patches at lists.fedorahosted.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 4:38:56 AM
> > Subject: [master][PATCH] Return the returned value in the fire_gtk_action
> >
> > There's no reason for discarding the value. If caller is not interested in
> > it,
> > they can always not assign it anywhere.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vratislav Podzimek <vpodzime at redhat.com>
> > ---
> > pyanaconda/ui/gui/utils.py | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/pyanaconda/ui/gui/utils.py b/pyanaconda/ui/gui/utils.py
> > index 4feb5bb..d8d8bb2 100644
> > --- a/pyanaconda/ui/gui/utils.py
> > +++ b/pyanaconda/ui/gui/utils.py
> > @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ def fire_gtk_action(func, *args):
> > def gtk_action():
> > func(*args)
> >
> > - gtk_action()
> > + return gtk_action()
> >
> > def gtk_action_nowait(func):
> > """Decorator method which ensures every call of the decorated function
> > to be
> > --
> > 1.8.5.3
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > anaconda-patches mailing list
> > anaconda-patches at lists.fedorahosted.org
> > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-patches
> >
>
> Do you need to add a return to the body of gtk_action() to make this return meaningful?
Ooops, wrong patch sent. I already have this in a local copy. Good
catch, thanks!
--
Vratislav Podzimek
Anaconda Rider | Red Hat, Inc. | Brno - Czech Republic
More information about the anaconda-patches
mailing list