[master/f20] btrfs and xfs do not support fsck or dump at boot time (#862871)
Brian C. Lane
bcl at redhat.com
Fri Dec 6 03:04:29 UTC 2013
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:52:37AM +0100, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 11:54 -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> > From: "Brian C. Lane" <bcl at redhat.com>
> >
> > ---
> > blivet/formats/fs.py | 4 ----
> > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/blivet/formats/fs.py b/blivet/formats/fs.py
> > index 43f9d44..103717e 100644
> > --- a/blivet/formats/fs.py
> > +++ b/blivet/formats/fs.py
> > @@ -1030,8 +1030,6 @@ class BTRFS(FS):
> > _linuxNative = True
> > _maxLabelChars = 256
> > _supported = True
> > - _dump = True
> > - _check = True
> > _packages = ["btrfs-progs"]
> > _minSize = 256
> > _maxSize = 16 * 1024 * 1024
> > @@ -1191,8 +1189,6 @@ class XFS(FS):
> > _formattable = True
> > _linuxNative = True
> > _supported = True
> > - _dump = True
> > - _check = True
> > _packages = ["xfsprogs"]
> > _infofs = "xfs_db"
> > _defaultInfoOptions = ["-c", "\"sb 0\"", "-c", "\"p dblocks\"",
> Is this really still true? I've just moved my Fedora 20 from an HDD to
> an SSD and from ext4 to xfs yesterday and boot time fsck on xfs worked
> well (even if I didn't expect it to). Also, now that xfs is the default
> filesystem for RHEL I think it would have to support that.
Yes. According to the manpage the fsck.xfs that is run at boot time is a
noop. It does the checking at mount time instead.
--
Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT)
More information about the anaconda-patches
mailing list