Replacing Cucumber

Martin Povolny mpovolny at redhat.com
Thu Nov 22 12:08:15 UTC 2012


On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:30:30AM +0100, Michal Fojtik wrote:
> 
> On Nov 22, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Tomas Sedovic <tsedovic at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 11/22/2012 08:42 AM, Martin Povolny wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >> 
> >> Many of the developers agree with dropping cucumber. No one was against
> >> it. Reasons where given in a different thread.
> > 
> > I'd like to point out that everyone who replied to the previous thread was in Brno. Today's Thanksgiving in the US so I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't even get to the email.
> > 
> > I recommend we wait before declaring consensus at least until Monday.
> 
> +1
> 
> Sorry for keeping advocating Minitest:
> 
> http://metaskills.net/2011/03/26/using-minitest-spec-with-rails/
> 
> You can also use Minitest with Capibara in Rails.
> 
> As I mentioned, the minitest pros is that it is part of the Ruby
> standard library, so no extra dependencies. It has lovely DSL and it is
> highly extendable :)
> 

I personally do not care. Minitest is as fine as RSpec is. But from the
project point of view, given we have the rest of test is RSpec, I see no
reason to change that.

-- 
Martin Povolny <mpovolny at redhat.com>
tel. +420777714458



More information about the aeolus-devel mailing list