Mission Statement - Was Re: Aeolus Developer Conference Report. ACKS REQUIRED BY NOV 13.

Scott Seago sseago at redhat.com
Wed Nov 14 17:52:18 UTC 2012


On 11/14/2012 12:44 PM, Hugh Brock wrote:
> Apologies folks, I'm out of pocket for the next couple days and haven't had a second to organize this vote. It'll be Friday unless someone else wants to organize it sooner.
>
> -hugh
>
> -------- Original Message --------
>   From: Justin Clift <jclift at redhat.com>
>   Sent: Wed, 14/11/2012 12:19 PM
>   To: aeolus-devel <aeolus-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org>
>   CC:
>   Subject: Mission Statement - Was Re: Aeolus Developer Conference Report. ACKS	REQUIRED BY NOV 13.
>
> On 14/11/2012, at 3:00 PM, Scott Seago wrote:
> <snip>
>> Hmm. OK, I guess to me it's fairly clear that if we can handle >1, we can handle 1 too, but I have no real objections to mentioning both, if it can be done in such a way that everyone agrees to the wording. What is essential, though, is that we do mention multi-instance systems, since that's a huge part of what we do. In other words, by all means lets make it clear that we handle "one or more instances" -- but not at the expense of not making it equally clear that we handle complex multi-instance systems well.
> Hmmm, we seem to have started bike-shedding on the mission
> statement a while back. ;)
>
> Let's get the list of mission statement candidates written
> up, then vote to pick the winner.
>
> + Justin
>
>
Yeah, this discussion is repeating what we hashed out last week. 
Unfortunately, mmorsi wasn't there last week, so he wasn't there for the 
original hashing-out -- hence this point coming up again.

That said, I'm fine voting on the results of last week, but Hugh did say 
earlier in the week that on-list suggestions/tweaks were fair game for 
this discussion.

Scott




More information about the aeolus-devel mailing list